In 2016 the award for best paper submitted at the Annual Scientific Meeting was introduced to recognise excellence and originality in the research and practice of occupational health. The award is named in honour of long standing member and respected educator David Goddard.
David Goddard graduated in medicine from Monash University in 1969. Post-graduate coursework led to his obtaining a Diploma in Occupational Health (University of Sydney, 1975) and a Master in Health Professional Education (Monash University, 2010). He has worked in occupational medicine since 1973 and as a medical educator since 1990. His years of experience with the railways, State Government Occupational Health Service, State Worker's Compensation system and his network of practitioner friends have contributed in their own ways to his teaching.
David teaches medical undergraduates in occupational medicine and has taught postgraduate students in occupational hygiene, toxicology and basic OHS. He has a passion for teaching, which in 2001 led to his being awarded the Monash University Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.
Between 2008 and 2013, he worked part-time as lead Fellow in educational development with the Australasian Faculty of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (AFOEM) in the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. He led development of a new training curriculum, a training handbook, formative assessments and the summative assessment for basic trainees. In May 2013, he received the AFOEM President’s award for outstanding contribution to education, training and assessment.
Victoria Oey - David Goddard Best Paper 2018
Victoria Oey, Melinda Miller, David Goddard (left to right)
Annual Scientific Meeting 2018, Melbourne
Paper: Influencing recovery from work injury from an insurer's perspective
Authors: Dr Chris Colqhuoun FAFOEM, Dr Victoria Oey FAFOEM
Learning objectives: To trial initiatives designed to improve worker and employer experience in the NSW workers compensation system with a view to improve health outcomes for injured workers, including accessing faster treatment and
improving relationships with healthcare providers. These initiatives are led by an internal Medical Office that brings the expertise of qualified medical specialists to the organisation.
Methods and findings: A trial of a Medical Support Panel, where occupational physicians and psychiatrists work within the insurer to review and make recommendations on treatment and/or medical causation proved effective. The Panel have successfully reduced time taken for some decision to be made from six weeks to five days. A pilot program to 'prescribe' social activities for workers who are not yet able to return to work has shown promising results. Long-term the impact of these opportunities for creating and maintaining social relationships will postively influence outcomes by reducing the likelihood of secondary psychosocial conditions developing.
Conclusions and implications for practice: By proactively seeking ways to support injured workers, icare has seen a reduction in timeframes for workers to receive treatment. While it is too early to quantify impacts in return to work and claims costs from these initiatives, early indications are that the desired results are starting to be seen. The embedding of in-house medical knowledge at icare has also increased productive dialogue with healthcare providers and in conjunction with a new streamlined claims model and triaging process all stakeholders, including health professional and workers will see an improvement in how workers compensation claims are handled.
Prof Malcolm Sim - David Goddard Best Paper 2017
Melinda Miller and David Goddard
Melinda Miller accepting the award on behalf of Prof Malcolm Sim
Paper: The impact of sustained hot weather on risk of acute work-related injury in Melbourne, Australia
Learning objectives: The presentation will enhance learning about injury outcomes following extended hot ambient temperatures, a little-known risk in occupational health.
Method & findings: A time-stratified case crossover study design using workers’ compensation claim data examined the association between consecutive days and consecutive nights of hot weather and risk of work-related injury in Melbourne during 2002-2012. Two and three consecutive days of hot weather was associated with an increased risk of injury. This effect became apparent at 27.6 °C, equivalent to the 70 percentile of maximum temperature distributions for Melbourne during the study period. Exposure to three days of hot weather and the highest temperatures, but not extreme temperatures, was associated with the strongest effect, with a 15% increased risk of injury for workers (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30) exposed to temperatures ≥33.3°C on 3 consecutive days, compared to those who were not. Differences were found for different age groups.
Conclusions & implications for practice: Significant associations between consecutive days of hot weather and risk of work-related injury were apparent at relatively mild temperatures. These findings suggest warnings to minimise harm to workers from hot weather should be given and prevention protocols initiated when consecutive days of temperatures lower than extreme temperatures are forecast.
Paper: Findings of a major mental wellbeing survey - focusing efforts and challenging stereotypes
Rio Tinto Iron Ore (WA) recognised in 2013 that whilst we had many data sources which document the physical health and safety of our workforce, that there was significantly less data was available to understand the 'full picture' of the mental health of our employees.
Subsequently, in 2014 we established a project to measure the baseline mental wellbeing profile of our employee workforce, in consultation with a Clinical Psychologist and a market and social research company. The survey was conducted in September 2015, and 2006 employees volunteered to participate.
The survey has resulted in a number of major benefits including:
the ability to make more informed decisions regarding mental wellbeing priorities, and resource allocation, based on quantitative evidence;
an excellent engagement process with our employees which has challenged the stigma surrounding poor mental health by making it 'okay to talk about whether you are okay' at work, and
the ability to challenge some common stereotypes in the mining industry e.g. if you are FIFO, you are at greater risk of poor mental health.
We feel that there are useful learnings from this survey that may be adopted more broadly across other employment sectors when considering the mental wellbeing of the workforce.